a compilation of products, furniture, jewelry, architecture and artists that float our boat.
eye
candy

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Arc'Teryx Arro 22 vs. Patagonia Lightweight Travel Pack



I love backpacks. There are a million types out there and they all have their own particular uses. I have 6 backpacks/shoulder bags that I use for different things. But what it typically comes down to is weight. Take these two packs for example. The Arc'Teryx Arro 22 (left) is one of my favorites, except that the pack weight by itself is already 1110 grams and has a volume of 1,350 cubic inches. Meanwhile, the Patagonia Lightweight Travel Pack weighs in at 284 grams and has a volume of 1,200 cubic inches. So picking the pack depends on what your outing at hand is and how much rough and tumble you plan on getting into. The Arro feels completely Jack Bauer bomb-proof and the Patagonia pack could probably be flown as a kite. But to carry around 5 times the weight in the pack alone is a big compromise. I say go lighter, your shoulders, neck and feet will thank you.

2 comments:

  1. I bought a patagona travel pack recently. I removed back panel and got it down to 8ozs. Pack is very strong and easily stuffs into stuffsack. I use as bicycle commuter pack. After purchase I packed it full of gear and put it in the shower for 10 minutes... Not 100% waterproof but close enough.

    ReplyDelete
  2. nothing is waterproof. Only water resistant.

    ReplyDelete

We've been getting some spam comments in the past few months, and so have turned on comment moderation, but if you are a real, live person not touting drugs, we'll get your comment up, asap! Also, comments left under user names that are obvious spam keywords (some recent ones: dining room tables, organic baby cribs) will be deleted. Thanks!